On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Pierre GM <pgmdevl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2010, at 8:14 PM, David Goldsmith wrote > > > Is the present issue an instance where Scott's second statement is > invalid, an instance where its validity is resulting in a poor docstring for > the function, or an instance in which Scott's "recommendation" was not > followed? > > The methods' docstring are fine, but we could improve the way the > corresponding function docstrings are created. > Does anyone have an idea of how universal of a problem this is (i.e., is it just confined to ma)? Scott's statement appears to imply that he thought there was no problem at all. DG
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
