On Feb 12, 2010, at 11:01 PM, David Goldsmith wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Pierre GM <pgmdevl...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 12, 2010, at 8:14 PM, David Goldsmith wrote > > > Is the present issue an instance where Scott's second statement is invalid, > > an instance where its validity is resulting in a poor docstring for the > > function, or an instance in which Scott's "recommendation" was not followed? > > The methods' docstring are fine, but we could improve the way the > corresponding function docstrings are created. > > Does anyone have an idea of how universal of a problem this is (i.e., is it > just confined to ma)?
Likely to be just a numpy.ma issue. I'll try to find some kind of fix. _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
