On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 3:24 PM, <josef.p...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Pauli Virtanen <p...@iki.fi> wrote:
>
>> 05.02.2016, 19:55, Nathaniel Smith kirjoitti:
>> > On Feb 5, 2016 8:28 AM, "Chris Barker - NOAA Federal" <
>> chris.bar...@noaa.gov>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> An extra ~2 hours of tests / 6-way parallelism is not that big a deal
>> >>> in the grand scheme of things (and I guess it's probably less than
>> >>> that if we can take advantage of existing binary builds)
>> >>
>> >> If we set up a numpy-testing conda channel, it could be used to cache
>> >> binary builds for all he versions of everything we want to test
>> >> against.
>> >>
>> >> Conda-build-all could make it manageable to maintain that channel.
>> >
>> > What would be the advantage of maintaining that channel ourselves
>> instead
>> > of using someone else's binary builds that already exist (e.g.
>> Anaconda's,
>> > or official project wheels)?
>>
>> ABI compatibility. However, as I understand it, not many backward ABI
>> incompatible changes in Numpy are not expected in future.
>>
>> If they were, I note that if you work in the same environment, you can
>> push repeated compilation times to zero compared to the time it takes to
>> run tests in a way that requires less configuration, by enabling
>> ccache/f90cache.
>>
>
>
> control of fortran compiler and libraries
>
> I was just looking at some new test errors on TravisCI in unchanged code
> of statsmodels, and it looks like conda switched from openblas to mkl
> yesterday.
>
> (statsmodels doesn't care when compiling which BLAS/LAPACK is used as long
> as they work because we don't have Fortran code.)
>
> Josef
>
>
(sending again, delivery refused)


>
>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
>> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
>> https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Reply via email to