Hi,
Dirk Reiners wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On 03/18/2010 09:07 PM, Carsten Neumann wrote:
>
>>> function() {
>>> ...
>>> NodePtr node = makeCoredNode<ComponentTransform>(&m_ct );
>>>
>> ^^^
>> ... when you do this. makeCoredNode<T> creates a new core of type T,
>> sets it as core of the returned Node and additionally gives you a
>> pointer to the newly created core in the argument.
>>
>
> Yup. My guess is you want
>
> NodePtr node = makeNodeFor(&m_ct );
>
Ooh that looks neater, I did:
NodePtr highlight = Node::create();
beginEditCP(highlight, Node::CoreFieldMask);
highlight->setCore(m_ct);
endEditCP(highlight, Node::CoreFieldMask);
> In the end it probably doesn't matter, assuming you add the NodePtr you
> create
> to the scene. As long as () is called before setScale it should work expect
> for
> the little memory leak of the original core.
>
> So that doesn't really explain your problem.
>
The issue was that I created and set m_ct, then called function(), so
m_ct was newly created. My print out of the matrix was at the end of my
set function so still printed the correct (old) m_ct value. Doh! I don't
know why it worked when I tried a TransformPtr, but must have been me
doing something differently.
> Could you send the whole source file? There seems to be missing that we're
> missing here.
>
> Dirk
Thanks for every ones time,
Andrew
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
