On Tuesday 06 March 2007 05:15 pm, Dan Price wrote:
> I looked a busybox a while back, and think that providing a port to
> Solaris would be be a fine project for anyone looking to brush up
> their UNIX hacking skills.

Dan,

I think BusyBox would be good to have, no question. I do ask myself though, 
what would we be trying to solve by doing so?

Certainly having Solaris/OpenSolaris running on embedded hardware, or hardware 
with a small footprint, to be advantageous...and this could be the 
goal...just to get a smaller footprint.

Having a clean port for the community to use on Solaris might inspire someone 
to create a solution using it, so that in itself could be a big plus.

I am interested in a project that does such, depending on how my time is 
sliced up and how much I have.

I just want to point out that this thread started in regards to Perl, and 
there is no Perl component of BusyBox, AFAIK. With that said, having BusyBox 
for embedded and/or other small footprint systems could be a big plus for the 
folks wanting to move into that area with OpenSolaris.

In fact, I will say this...you would have a very hard time trying to do any 
type of embedded work without BusyBox, it or a similar solution would be 
mandatory, IMO.

-- 

Alan DuBoff - Solaris x86 Engineering - IHV/OEM Group
Advocate of insourcing at Sun - hire people that care about our company!


_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code

Reply via email to