"Roger A. Faulkner" wrote: [snip] > As for ksh93, we'd have to invent the procedure. > I certainly hope that making the code lint-clean would be viewed > favorably by the community and that pushing such changes upstream > would be straightforward. Ditto for bug fixes (or have you fixed > the last bug in ksh93? :-) Won't happen for a while, at least.
Slightly offtopic: Is there a reason why "lintcheck" doesn't include the values from CERRWARN ? The tree uses "CERRWARN += -erroff=E_UNRECOGNIZED_PRAGMA_IGNORED" in some places but it seems that this option is not used in the "lint" call... ;-( ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED] \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;) _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
