> > As for ksh93, we'd have to invent the procedure.
 > > I certainly hope that making the code lint-clean would be viewed
 > > favorably by the community and that pushing such changes upstream
 > > would be straightforward.  Ditto for bug fixes (or have you fixed
 > > the last bug in ksh93? :-)  Won't happen for a while, at least.
 > 
 > Slightly offtopic: Is there a reason why "lintcheck" doesn't include the
 > values from CERRWARN ? The tree uses "CERRWARN +=
 > -erroff=E_UNRECOGNIZED_PRAGMA_IGNORED" in some places but it seems that
 > this option is not used in the "lint" call... ;-(

I don't think there's a good reason (though I'm not aware of any
documentation that states the "erroff" namespaces are fully compatible).

-- 
meem
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code

Reply via email to