Peter Memishian wrote: > > > > As for ksh93, we'd have to invent the procedure. > > > I certainly hope that making the code lint-clean would be viewed > > > favorably by the community and that pushing such changes upstream > > > would be straightforward. Ditto for bug fixes (or have you fixed > > > the last bug in ksh93? :-) Won't happen for a while, at least. > > > > Slightly offtopic: Is there a reason why "lintcheck" doesn't include the > > values from CERRWARN ? The tree uses "CERRWARN += > > -erroff=E_UNRECOGNIZED_PRAGMA_IGNORED" in some places but it seems that > > this option is not used in the "lint" call... ;-( > > I don't think there's a good reason (though I'm not aware of any > documentation that states the "erroff" namespaces are fully compatible).
Should I file a bug ? ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED] \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;) _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
