Hi Paul I rebased the patch, and working on unit testing too https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41827/
2013/10/23 Paul Michali <[email protected]>: > See PCM: in-line. > > > PCM (Paul Michali) > > MAIL [email protected] > IRC pcm_ (irc.freenode.net) > TW @pmichali > > On Oct 23, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Akihiro Motoki <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Paul Michali <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > Some questions on VPNaaS… > > Can we get the review reopened of the service type framework changes for VPN > on the server side? > I was thinking of trying to rebase that patch, based on the latest from > master, but before doing so, I ran TOX on the latest master commit. TOX > fails with a bunch of errors, some reporting that the system is out of > memory. I have a 4GB Ubuntu 12.04 VM for this and I see it max out on > memory, when TOX is run on the whole Neutron code for py27. Anyone seen > this? > > > I see this too. On 4GB Ubuntu 13.04 VM, I have over 1GB swap while > running the whole test > and the test slows down after swap begins…. > > > PCM: Whew! I was worried that it was something in my setup. Any idea on a > root cause/workaround? Is this happening when Jenkins runs? > > > > > > I have tried the current patch of service type framework, and found that > client changes are needed too. I have changes ready for review, should I > post them, or do we need to wait (or indicate some dependency on the server > side changes)? > > > My suggestion is to post a patch with WIP status. > We can test the server side patch with CLI. It really helps us all. > > > PCM: Thanks! I wasn't sure how to proceed as the client change is useless > w/o the server change. Yeah, please push wip :) > > I see that there is VPN connection status and VPN service status. What is > the purpose of the latter? What is the status, if the service has multiple > connections in different states? > > > I see the same. > > > PCM: Yeah, need to understand what the desired meaning is for the service > status in this context. > In openswan impl, vpnservice state is the state of openswan process. ipsec-site-connection state is actual connection state. so let's say we have two site. Vpnservice will be ACTIVE and ipsec-site-connection's state will be DOWN after we setup only one site. > > > Have you guys tried VPNaaS with Havana and the now default ML2 plugin? I got > a failure on connection create, saying that it could not find > get_l3_agents_hosting_routers() attribute. I haven't looked into this yet, > but will try as soon as I can. > > > I think https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1238846 is same as > what you encountered. > I believe this bug was fixed in the final RC. Doesn't it work? > > > PCM: Ah, I missed that bug review. I probably need to update my repo with > the latest to pick this up. Thanks! > > Regards, > > PCM > > > > Thanks, > Akihiro > > > Thanks! > > PCM (Paul Michali) > > Contact info for Cisco users http://twiki.cisco.com/Main/pcm > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
