I put the client code out for review as WIP: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/53602/
Regards, PCM (Paul Michali) MAIL [email protected] IRC pcm_ (irc.freenode.net) TW @pmichali On Oct 23, 2013, at 4:53 PM, Nachi Ueno <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Paul > > I rebased the patch, and working on unit testing too > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41827/ > > > 2013/10/23 Paul Michali <[email protected]>: >> See PCM: in-line. >> >> >> PCM (Paul Michali) >> >> MAIL [email protected] >> IRC pcm_ (irc.freenode.net) >> TW @pmichali >> >> On Oct 23, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Akihiro Motoki <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Paul, >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Paul Michali <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Hi guys, >> >> Some questions on VPNaaS… >> >> Can we get the review reopened of the service type framework changes for VPN >> on the server side? >> I was thinking of trying to rebase that patch, based on the latest from >> master, but before doing so, I ran TOX on the latest master commit. TOX >> fails with a bunch of errors, some reporting that the system is out of >> memory. I have a 4GB Ubuntu 12.04 VM for this and I see it max out on >> memory, when TOX is run on the whole Neutron code for py27. Anyone seen >> this? >> >> >> I see this too. On 4GB Ubuntu 13.04 VM, I have over 1GB swap while >> running the whole test >> and the test slows down after swap begins…. >> >> >> PCM: Whew! I was worried that it was something in my setup. Any idea on a >> root cause/workaround? Is this happening when Jenkins runs? >> >> >> >> >> >> I have tried the current patch of service type framework, and found that >> client changes are needed too. I have changes ready for review, should I >> post them, or do we need to wait (or indicate some dependency on the server >> side changes)? >> >> >> My suggestion is to post a patch with WIP status. >> We can test the server side patch with CLI. It really helps us all. >> >> >> PCM: Thanks! I wasn't sure how to proceed as the client change is useless >> w/o the server change. > > Yeah, please push wip :) > >> >> I see that there is VPN connection status and VPN service status. What is >> the purpose of the latter? What is the status, if the service has multiple >> connections in different states? >> >> >> I see the same. >> >> >> PCM: Yeah, need to understand what the desired meaning is for the service >> status in this context. >> > > In openswan impl, > vpnservice state is the state of openswan process. > ipsec-site-connection state is actual connection state. > > so let's say we have two site. > Vpnservice will be ACTIVE and ipsec-site-connection's state will be DOWN after > we setup only one site. > > >> >> >> Have you guys tried VPNaaS with Havana and the now default ML2 plugin? I got >> a failure on connection create, saying that it could not find >> get_l3_agents_hosting_routers() attribute. I haven't looked into this yet, >> but will try as soon as I can. >> >> >> I think https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1238846 is same as >> what you encountered. >> I believe this bug was fixed in the final RC. Doesn't it work? >> >> >> PCM: Ah, I missed that bug review. I probably need to update my repo with >> the latest to pick this up. Thanks! >> >> Regards, >> >> PCM >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> Akihiro >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> PCM (Paul Michali) >> >> Contact info for Cisco users http://twiki.cisco.com/Main/pcm >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
