See http://www.opensymphony.com:8668/space/XWork+1.0+Mission+Statement
And http://www.opensymphony.com:8668/space/WebWork%202.0%20Mission%20Statement Basically, Xwork is going to be the core generic command pattern implementation. Webwork 2.0 is going to be an MVC framework tailored for the web and built on Xwork 1.0. So the real question here is whether it makes sense to partition Webwork 2.0 into: Webwork-core Webwork-el Webwork-jsp Webwork-velocity Webwork-xslt Webwork-jasperreports Webwork-freemarket There may be later extensions to Xwork as well (JMSWork?, MailWork?). Personally, I think Webwork is small enough to stand as one module with all of the view types included. > -----Original Message----- > From: Philipp Meier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 12:02 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [OS-webwork] Partition XWork [Was: Re: XWork flux] > > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 07:37:45AM -0800, Jason Carreira wrote: > > > Oh, other than the ThreadLocal thing, there are also remaining > > questions about Ognl and whether we can plug in our EL, or > whether it > > should be undertaken to re-architect our existing EL for > performance. > > I want to propose to partition the xwork in several > (independent) modules. Because I e.g. do not use jsp or > velicity, and because I do not contribute to the development, > it would be nice to seperate them from the core stuff. It > makes sense to me to have the following cvs modules: > > * xwork (or xwork-core) > * xwork-web (ServletDispatcher and FilterDispatcher and so on.) > * xwork-view-el (used by jsp and velocity) > * xwork-view-jsp > * xwork-view-velocity > * xwork-view-xslt > * xwork-view-freemarker > * xwork-jms (Dispatcher and helpers for JMS) > * xwork-mail (Dispatcher and helpers for Mail) > > Does this make sense? I see xwork growing and growing and > becoming more and more confusing. On the other hand, size > does matter and we must consider that every view type needs > it's supporting libraries. > > My €0.02, > -billy. > > -- > Meisterbohne Söflinger Straße 100 Tel: > +49-731-399 499-0 > eLösungen 89077 Ulm Fax: > +49-731-399 499-9 > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
