Ok, gotcha. Try this for the first paragraph: This is the first release of a complete rewrite of WebWork, a hierarchical pull-MVC framework. Many web frameworks suffer from being tightly coupled to the Servlet spec when it is not necessary, especially Struts. This makes both unit testing your command components (Actions in Xwork / WebWork) and reusing them outside a web application very difficult or impossible. With XWork, the OpenSymphony team went back to the drawing board to create a powerful generic command pattern implementation which makes unit testing and code reuse much simpler. WebWork2 leverages the power of XWork at its core and builds upon it with web application framework specific code. This separation allows for each project to specialize and do what it does best without the possibility of contaminating or limiting either code base.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Hani Suleiman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 10:16 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] XW/WW2 "press release" text for review > > > > On Monday, August 18, 2003, at 09:56 PM, Jason Carreira wrote: > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Hani Suleiman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 9:29 PM > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] XW/WW2 "press release" text for review > >> > >> > >> 1) I don't see the need to cuss webwork1. > > > > I didn't see it that way. I remember several discussions back and > > forth about feature implementations and whether they should > maintain > > the web-agnosticism or be specifically tailored to web > applications, > > since that's what most people were doing. I think what I said was > > honest and not derogatory. > > > Well, if you want to highlight how it beats existing > solutions/architectures, then pick on Struts. Picking on webwork1 as > the 'problem' solution seems silly. Attack the competition, not your > own products. What you said IS honest, I'm not saying you're being > dishonest, just that from a marketing perspective, I don't > think it's a > smart move. When BEA releases a new version, they don't say 'well > version 7 sucked, so we came up with version 8', they say > 'oracle/websphere suck, and the cool things we added to version 8 fix > all THEIR problems' > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites > including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are > available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or > Visual Studio .NET. > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet _072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
