Ok, thanks - I've unwound that one too. I'll hold off thinking about where to put 'man' - it mneeds to be coherent with where the source code looks for it and I've lost track of how that all works.
cheers M On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 04:42:14PM +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > On 08/19/13 16:27, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > > On 08/19/13 07:43, Miller Puckette wrote: > >> OK... I left these ones out: > >> > >> pd2puredata.patch > >> usrlibpd_path.patch > >> fixmanpage.patch > >> helpbrowser_puredata-doc.patch > >> > >> since I think they're debian-specific; took the other 11. Thanks - they > >> look > >> helpful! > > > > thanks for taking them in. > > oops, i just noticed one patch that was included and probably should not > have been: > in debian we patch away the use of the internal portaudio/portmidi > libraries in order to use the system installed libraries. > this is most likely not wanted with the ordinary Pd distribution, so it > might be a good idea to revert patch 5f2af0674 > > > > and to resolve some confusion about Debian and BSD: > while Debian is mainly using linux as the underlying kernel, there are > also flavours with using "GNU/hurd" and "BSD" as the underlying kernel - > hence the patches. > i guess Debian is the system that most often compiles Pd on a > BSD-platform (using the autobuilds; no idea how many people actually use > it that way) > > > fgmasdr > IOhannes > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list