So what? We are talking about final images that are no larger than the 35 mm frame.
Don Dr E D F Williams http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery Updated: March 30, 2002 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andre Langevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 11:41 PM Subject: Re: 35mm vs 8x10 macro > Am I wrong or we should talk about lenses used and way they are used? > > I put a reversed Componon on a bellows and photograph a dime at > double life size. On the monorail, I focus the same setting so that > the dime is 10 times life size. Componon being a fine performer at > both 1:2 and 1:10. So which negative will give me more detail from > the same lens? > > Andre > -- >
