Since the fa and the Super Takumar have pretty much identical optical
formulas and the FA has much improved coatings I doubt that the Tak.
will be better. I always found the 50 f1.7 to be very good but in
extreme situation you'll get flair with any lens.
On 2/20/2010 6:48 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Our dojo is doing belt tests this week. I was taking pictures this
morning and my p-fa 50/1.4 had lots of nasty flare from the light
coming in through the windows. While the remaining tests will be in
the evening, for future reference would the M 50/1.7 or the
supertakumar 50/1.4 be noticeably better at reducing flare?
Since I needed to keep changing lenses to get the right focal length,
I was really wishing I had a 16-50. I expect that for the evening
tests, I'll wish I had a 16-50 and a K-x.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier
New;}}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 I've just upgraded to Thunderbird 3.0 and the
interface subtly weird.\par
}
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
