CheekyGeek wrote: >On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Mark Roberts <m...@robertstech.com> wrote: >> Yep. I'm extremely happy with the Samsung sensor and can easily wait >> to upgrade. If I do, it'll be because of the lower minimum ISO of 80 >> rather than the high ISO settings of the K-5. > >OK. Let's look at it on your terms: >In a digital camera, I would argue that lower ISOs are *primarily* >important for the maximum Dynamic Range that they provide.
Not to me. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.