Here is the comparable review for the 24-70: http://tinyurl.com/jt8lwv7
The 2.8 aperture and prolly the nicer bokeh are things to consider over the 28-105. On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Gonz <rgonzoma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well given the outstanding review given here: > http://tinyurl.com/zhprgcx, I would say that unless you want to blow > up your pics to wall size, this lens will fulfill most requirements > (28-105) and is a heck of a lot more affordable. > > > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Gonz <rgonzoma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> No, I'm in the Austin, Tx area. >> >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Larry Colen <l...@red4est.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Gonz wrote: >>>> >>>> Anybody have both of these lenses and compared them? The 24-70 is >>>> almost 3x the price of the 28-105 and besides the constant 2.8 >>>> aperture, is the image quality that much better? >>> >>> >>> Aren't you in the bay area? You're welcome to come over and try mine for >>> yourself sometime. >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. >> >> >> >> -- >> -- Reduce your Government Footprint > > > > -- > -- Reduce your Government Footprint -- -- Reduce your Government Footprint -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
