Dear Joe,
I've been reading the quotes you supplied with
interest. I'm trying to formulate a good question but can't. Could
you say a bit about what you think are some of the main issues, points of
interest or conclusions to be taken from these passages. If you
have the time and inclination I'd be very interested in your thoughts. I'm
struggling with how much meaning is inherent in the sensuous impression vs how
much of meaning is a matter of interpretation -- just to give you an
example of a bad question! Maybe that's what I'm seeking from you -- can
you give provide me better question to guide my inquiry into these
exeprts? What is fundamentally at issue here from Peire's standpoint?
Thanks,
Jim Piat
--- Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber archive@mail-archive.com |
- [peirce-l] Re: Epistemological Primacy in Peirce NL... Steven Ericsson-Zenith
- [peirce-l] Re: Epistemological Primacy in Peir... Arnold Shepperson
- [peirce-l] Re: Epistemological Primacy in Peir... Steven Ericsson-Zenith
- [peirce-l] Re: Epistemological Primacy in Peir... Jim Piat