Tom wrote: > Stark alternatives -- those who don't have > "naive faith" must believe the thing is a > "total sham". One could base a fundamentalism > on such a dichotomy.
This has always been my problem with many a discussions on this and most other lists. It is as if people, not just the ones on this list, read stuff not with their eyes and brains but using some other "organs". Or maybe, they say things that they don't really mean; or maybe, I am just too naive. Sabri
