Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot should call a constructor implicitly

[Nick Ing-Simmons]

Damian Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>   > > But I agree that anything beyond that is simply horrible. You'll only
>   > > drive more people *away* from OO, because it generates so horribly
>   > > inefficient code. If you want a constructor called, than FGS *call* a
>   > > constructor. Maybe you can reduce the syntax necessary to do that, but
>   > > please don't do it behind our backs.
>   > 
>   > Well then, that's one nay vote.  :)
>
>Make that two.

Three.
-- 
Nick Ing-Simmons