> > But I agree that anything beyond that is simply horrible. You'll only
   > > drive more people *away* from OO, because it generates so horribly
   > > inefficient code. If you want a constructor called, than FGS *call* a
   > > constructor. Maybe you can reduce the syntax necessary to do that, but
   > > please don't do it behind our backs.
   > 
   > Well then, that's one nay vote.  :)

Make that two.

Damian

Reply via email to