On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Melvin Smith wrote:
> Maybe set the check to :
>
> if(rx->startindex-- == 0)
That still sets startindex to the equivalent of (unsigned) -1, which might
be something like 4294967295. I'm wondering whether that was the actual
intent. I suspect probably not. Perhaps Brent really wanted a -1 there
and forgot that startindex was unsigned. Perhaps this is supposed to be a
"Can't happen" branch and it would benefit from a stronger diagnostic. I
don't understand the surrounding context well enough to say.
--
Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dept. of Physics
Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042
