> I'm not going to have time to produce an RFC on this in time for the > cutoff point. (Which seems painfully soon tbh). I will be struggling to find the time too. I'll do my best. Damian
- Re: RFC 218 (v1) C<my Dog $spot> is just an assert... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 218 (v1) C<my Dog $spot> is just an a... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 218 (v1) C<my Dog $spot> is just ... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 218 (v1) C<my Dog $spot> is just ... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 218 (v1) C<my Dog $spot> is j... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 218 (v1) C<my Dog $spot> is just ... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 218 (v1) C<my Dog $spot> is just ... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 218 (v1) C<my Dog $spot> is j... Buddha Buck
- Re: RFC 218 (v1) C<my Dog $spot> ... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 218 (v1) C<my Dog $spot> is j... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 218 (v1) C<my Dog $spot> is j... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 218 (v1) C<my Dog $spot> is just an a... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 218 (v1) C<my Dog $spot> is just an a... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 218 (v1) C<my Dog $spot> is just ... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 218 (v1) C<my Dog $spot> is just an assert... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 218 (v1) C<my Dog $spot> is just an a... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 218 (v1) C<my Dog $spot> is just ... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 218 (v1) C<my Dog $spot> is j... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 218 (v1) C<my Dog $spot> ... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 218 (v1) C<my Dog $spot... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 218 (v1) C<my Dog $spot> is just an assert... Piers Cawley
