Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 09:48:27AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
> > Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Nope. fields::new() basically just does C<bless
> > > [\%{"$class\::FIELDS"}], $class>, but the current pseudohash
> > > implementation doesn't care if something is an object or not. It just
> > > cares about either A) its type or B) what's in $ph->[0].
> >
> > Hmm... it still feels like undocumented behaviour. I'd definitely be
> > inclined to tighten up the base/fields behaviour. My feeling is that
> > the proposal makes them closer to the Right Thing.
>
> Its plenty documented. But if we simply put a bullet into
> pseudo-hashes, as per RFC 241, this all goes away.
Indeedly.
--
Piers
