On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 11:15:40PM -0700, Peter Scott wrote:
>
>Sorry I didn't chime in earlier, but I would like to say that I prefer
>published deadlines. Reason: people will talk for as long as you give
>'em. However long a meeting is scheduled for, that's how long it will
>take. We're already reaching the point of diminishing returns in several
>discussions IMHO; if we let 'em drag on forever they may turn ugly.
>
>Besides, the -internals folk are waiting to see what they need to get going
>on. And I would think we'd want a time when we knew Larry could get going
>on the RFCs without wondering whether something else was going to romp out
>of the starting gate.
Well, there is a "hard" deadline set in the Project Plan / Roadmap, of
September 30th.
K.
--
Kirrily Robert -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://netizen.com.au/
Open Source development, consulting and solutions
Level 10, 500 Collins St, Melbourne VIC 3000
Phone: +61 3 9614 0949 Fax: +61 3 9614 0948 Mobile: +61 410 664 994
