Dave Storrs wrote: > On 17 Aug 2000, Johan Vromans wrote: > > Dave Storrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > 2) "express" should guarantee that, before it creates a variable > > > names $FOO, it first calls "local" on any existing $FOO > > > > Why, if the variable is lexical (see 3)? > > D'oh. s{2) .+^}{} > > Mismatch between brain and fingers there somewhere, thanks for > pointing it out. Huh? They need to be "globals", because the "with" mechanism is going to have to be able to write them into a symbol table. You can't do this with lexicals. (Well, maybe that'll be different in perl6?) -- John Porter
- Re: Default filehandles(was Re: command line option: $... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Default filehandles(was Re: command line option: $... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Default filehandles(was Re: command line option: $... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Default filehandles(was Re: command line option: $... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Default filehandles(was Re: command line option: $... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Default filehandles(was Re: command line option: $... Peter Scott
- pascal-like "with" was Re: Default filehand... David L. Nicol
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default file... Dave Storrs
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default file... Johan Vromans
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default file... Dave Storrs
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default file... John Porter
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default file... Johan Vromans
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default file... Dave Storrs
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default fileh... Clayton Scott
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default fileh... Dave Storrs
- implied pascal-like "with" or "express&... David L. Nicol
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... Jeremy Howard
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... David L. Nicol
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... David L. Nicol
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... Dave Storrs