Michele Dondi skribis 2005-10-25 17:17 (+0200): > Hmmm... maybe you're right that $__ is too huffmanized (and hence > confusing) but $OUTER::_ is somewhat too few...
for (1..9) -> $n { # ought to be more than enough eval qq[ macro prefix:<\$_$n> { "\${ "OUTER::" x $n }_" } ]; } And then you can use $_1 .. $_9. I think $_1 is much clearer than $__, but I think neither is needed in the standard language. Juerd -- http://convolution.nl/maak_juerd_blij.html http://convolution.nl/make_juerd_happy.html http://convolution.nl/gajigu_juerd_n.html