Fair points, all. I do think, though that if the concern is really with "the 4 cases when nqp hauls a CALL-ME out of its bowels" then that's what should be addressed...
Aaron Sherman, M.: P: 617-440-4332 Google Talk, Email and Google Plus: a...@ajs.com Toolsmith, developer, gamer and life-long student. On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Brandon Allbery <allber...@gmail.com> wrote: > Also... > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Aaron Sherman <a...@ajs.com> wrote: > >> Role-based testing seems very perl6ish. I'd suggest the role name be >> "Invocable" with much the sort of signature as you've described. > > > If it's Invokable then the method should probably be INVOKE. It still > leaves the question of why Callable appears to be the only role named > after what it applies to instead of what it provides. > > -- > brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine > associates > allber...@gmail.com > ballb...@sinenomine.net > unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad > http://sinenomine.net >
