-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:05:10 -0400 (EDT) Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Andrej Ricnik-Bay wrote: > > > A silly question in this context: If we know of a company that > > does use PostgreSQL but doesn't list it anywhere ... can we take > > the liberty to publicise this somewhere anyway? > > Bad idea. Very bad idea. > There are companies who consider being listed as a user of > a product a sort of recommendation of that technology, and > accordingly they will get really annoyed if you do that when they > didn't give you permission. This has actually happened, where > someone has asked to be removed from the list of those using > PostgreSQL. Yes it has. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake - -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL political pundit | Mocker of Dolphins -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH2fpEATb/zqfZUUQRAjktAJ9ApY2Mgtylm5Ud13wAIjoDhudfOACeNgQv cuEmfQ3IT3MtPoPcdazXwKw= =7NTF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
