Hi Adrian
I looked at the table in JEdit. The binary strings for the missing fields
are considerably longer than the others.
What limiting factor have I probably exceeded??
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: Adrian Klaver
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 4:14 PM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Cc: Bob Pawley
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Different views of remote server
On Wednesday, April 20, 2011 11:09:59 am Bob Pawley wrote:
Hi
This is probably going to turn out to be me doing something stupid, but-
I have two computers, one of which I use as a remote server for my
database.
When I connect to the remote database through my interface there are
errors
that suggest a problem with the data in one of the tables.
Using PgAdmin to view the remote table there is indeed some information
missing (5 out of 16 geoms).
When I use the PGAdmin on the remote computer, using a local connection,
this information is not missing it is intact.
I don’t think it is a PgAdmin problem because when I do a ‘select the_geom’
as a remote query the information is missing where it is not missing the
PgAdmin on the other computer as a local query.
Also connecting to the remote DB using Quantum GIS shows the “missing”
information as being present and normal.
I have also checked with a server display app and the appropriate number
of
servers are present (only one present on the remote computer).
I’ve run out of ideas - Would anyone have any thoughts of what might be
going on???
What is the schema for the table? What exactly is the data and do the 5
'missing' data differ markedly from the other data?
Bob
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@gmail.com
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
