On Dec15, 2010, at 16:45 , Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Florian Pflug <f...@phlo.org> wrote: >> On Dec14, 2010, at 15:01 , Robert Haas wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Florian Pflug <f...@phlo.org> wrote: >>>>> - serializable lock consistency - I am fairly certain this needs >>>>> rebasing. I don't have time to deal with it right away. That sucks, >>>>> because I think this is a really important change. >>>> I can try to find some time to update the patch if it suffers from >>>> bit-rot. Would that help? >>> >>> Yes! >> >> I've rebased the patch to the current HEAD, and re-run my FK concurrency >> test suite, >> available from https://github.com/fgp/fk_concurrency, to verify that things >> still work. > > Thanks, but, EWRONGTHREAD.
Sorry for that. I wasn't sure whether to post this here or into the original thread, and it seems I ended up on the losing side of that 50-50 chance ;-) Want me to repost there, or just remember to use the correct thread next time? best regards, Florian Pflug -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
