On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Florian Pflug <f...@phlo.org> wrote: > On Dec15, 2010, at 16:45 , Robert Haas wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Florian Pflug <f...@phlo.org> wrote: >>> On Dec14, 2010, at 15:01 , Robert Haas wrote: >>>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Florian Pflug <f...@phlo.org> wrote: >>>>>> - serializable lock consistency - I am fairly certain this needs >>>>>> rebasing. I don't have time to deal with it right away. That sucks, >>>>>> because I think this is a really important change. >>>>> I can try to find some time to update the patch if it suffers from >>>>> bit-rot. Would that help? >>>> >>>> Yes! >>> >>> I've rebased the patch to the current HEAD, and re-run my FK concurrency >>> test suite, >>> available from https://github.com/fgp/fk_concurrency, to verify that things >>> still work. >> >> Thanks, but, EWRONGTHREAD. > > Sorry for that. I wasn't sure whether to post this here or into the original > thread, > and it seems I ended up on the losing side of that 50-50 chance ;-) > > Want me to repost there, or just remember to use the correct thread next time?
Nah, don't bother reposting. It'd be helpful if you could add a link to that message on the CF app though. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
