Robert Haas wrote:
- instrument checkpoint sync calls - I plan to commit this in the next
48 hours.  (Hopefully Greg Smith will do the cleanup I suggested, if
not I'll do it.)

Yes, doing that tonight so you can have a simple (hopefully) bit of work to commit tomorrow.

- MERGE command - Returned with Feedback?  Not sure where we stand with this.

That's waiting for me to do another round of review. I'm getting to that soon I hope, maybe tomorrow.

- SQL/MED - file_fdw - Discussion is ongoing, but I see no harm in
marking this Returned with Feedback for now in anticipation of a new
version before CF 2011-01.
- SQL/MED - postgresql_fdw - Hasn't received as much review, I think,
so should probably be moved to next CF as-is.

I was thinking of just moving both of those into the next CF without adding any clear resolution code--then they can get worked on as feasible after the core goes in.


All in all it's disappointing to have so many major patches
outstanding at this point in the CommitFest, but I think we're just
going to have to make the best of it.

I've done a pretty lame job of pushings thing forward here, but I don't think things have progressed that badly. The community produced several large and/or multi-part patches that the CF could have choked on, and instead they've been broken into digestible chunks and kept chewing through them. I'm just glad that's happening in this CF, rather than a pile like this showing up for the last one.

Thanks for the wrap-up summary, I was going to do something like that myself tonight but you beat me to it.
--
Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    g...@2ndquadrant.com   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support        www.2ndQuadrant.us
"PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance": http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to