Michael Paquier escribió: > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > Looks good to me too. > > Based on the patch I already sent before, there are a couple of things > > missing: > > - There are no pg_ctl standby/recover commands implemented yet (no that > > difficult to add) > > - a certain amount of work is needed for documentation > > > > Btw, I have a concern about that: is it really the time to finish that for > > this release knowing that the 9.3 feature freeze is getting close? I still > > don't know when it will be but it is... close. > > > This patch is still in the current commit fest. Any objections in marking > it as returned with feedback and put it in the next commit fest? We could > work on that again at the next release as it looks that there is not much > time to work on it for 9.3. If the patch is almost ready, IMHO you should complete it and post a version that implements the consensus design. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
