On 3/8/13 10:34 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
This patch is still in the current commit fest. Any objections in marking it as returned with feedback and put it in the next commit fest?
There are currently 20 "Needs Review" and 14 "Waiting on Author" things left in the queue, so it's not quite that there's no time left. There really isn't very much left to do on this. The rough consensus idea from before takes a while to describe, but there was not a complicated implementation in that. The overlap with the still possible to commit SET PERSISTENT is probably the worst potential issue this is facing now, but that's not even a real issue yet.
If you're out of time to work on it and want to back out of here having made good progress, that's fine. I'd be tempted to work on this thing myself for a bit just to try and finally get it done. If it gets punted forward, we'll be right back to facing bit rot and remembering what was going on again, which is what killed the momentum toward committing this the last time.
-- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US g...@2ndquadrant.com Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
