Let me come up with a proper failing testcase and I will update the list. I was hoping for some general insight as I assumed it was just my misuse of the packages.
S. On Nov 1, 2011, at 5:34 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > let us know > because core collection should be really robust. > > Stef > > > On Nov 1, 2011, at 9:52 AM, mail list wrote: > >> I will check. Thank you. >> >> The problem is definitely something related to 'reachability'. eg I can >> save the top level objects but the second level objects (eg instance >> varaibles of the top level) I can not get to save. >> >> S. >> On Nov 1, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote: >> >>> Not sure if this is related, but the collection hierarchy got refactored in >>> Pharo at some point to include HashedCollection (AFAIR) as superclass. >>> Maybe this broke something with the persistence of Sets and Dictionaries? >>> >>> Lukas >>> >>> On Tuesday, 1 November 2011, mail list <mail.l...@ficonab.com> wrote: >>>> I am trying to deploy a Pharo 1.3 image using Goods and running into some >>>> basic issues where my objects are not persisted by reachability. >>>> eg I put dictionary x at root under a key 'test' >>>> eg db root at: 'test' put x. >>>> db commit. >>>> Then at x i updated instance variable and add something to its dictionary >>>> and committ >>>> eg x intancevariable y at: 'key' put 'zzzz' >>>> db commit >>>> >>>> looking at the root x does not get updated with y. >>>> >>>> I have the majority of the test cases pasing except for testIdentitySet >>>> and testFlushAllRemovesAllUnreferenced. >>>> >>>> In testIdentitySet the following failure >>>> | set x y y2 | >>>> set := KKIdentitySet database: dbOne. >>>> x := 1@1. >>>> y := 2@2. >>>> set add: x. >>>> set add: y. >>>> self assert: (set includes: x). >>>> self assert: (set includes: y). >>>> self deny: (set includes: 1@1). -->fails >>>> >>>> set = (2@2,1@1) >>>> so it seems to think that x and 1@1 are the same. Which to me seems >>>> correct but I may be misunderstanding the testcase. >>>> >>>> Any thoughts or pointers to update my mistakes in using Goods db would be >>>> helpful. >>>> >>>> S. >>>> On Oct 31, 2011, at 5:49 PM, Marcus Denker wrote: >>>> >>>>> 13320 >>>>> ----- >>>>> >>>>> Issue 4945: Weird Settings filtering >>>>> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4945 >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Lukas Renggli >>> www.lukas-renggli.ch >> > >
