I cant resist but to ask our linux gurus here on their opinion
regarding this issue.
The summary is: I am both right and wrong. Or, we are both
right and wrong.
Their unbiased opinions:
Guru#1 The definition of "Linux is a kernel" or "Linux is an OS" is context
dependent. Meaning both definitions are correct. It depends on what issue
you are discussing.
Guru#2 In the early days of Linux, Linux is the kernel and GNU/Linux is
the OS. Now, the word Linux has evolved and has been overused to mean
that Linux is an OS.
I hope that we all learn from this discussion by playing on the
issue not on unrelated things.
Peace...
-rowel
>
> > linux is not a kernel. linux is an OS. An OS is composed of
> > layers. ...
>
> <sarcastic> thank you for enlightening us </sarcastic> geez what kinda educ
> system does .au has?
>
> guys,
>
> please avoid this, everybody makes a mistake. let us create a healthy
> and constructive community here.
>
> fooler.
> + its not how you win the game but how you play the game.
>
>
>
> _
> Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
> To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_
Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
