SlimChances wrote: > it seems a bit of a regression from Erlands DP which survived clear > library rescans Regression? That's a bit annoying, especially considering that adding dynamic playlists *with* (user-input) parameters to favs *wasn't even possible* with Erland's DPL. Yes, it's always been possible to add dynamic playlists *without* user-input parameters to favs, i.e. dynamic playlists that *don't* ask questions when you start them. And of course, these favs wouldn't be affected by any rescan because their urls contain no user-input parameters. And that hasn't changed with DPL3, not one bit. Adding dynamic playlists *with* (user-input) parameters to favs was an experimental feature that came later with DPL*3*. So... having a hard time to see the alleged regression here. If you want genres, artists or albums to stick across rescans, you name them in your SQLite statement of your custom dynamic playlist which you then add to LMS favs. Those favs will always survive rescans (their *url* contains no parameters) as long as you don't change the file name or extension. Same as in DPL2. Maybe it's better if I disable adding dynamic playlists *with* (user input) parameters to favs by default in the next update to avoid confusion and support problems. Then it will be like DPL2: you can only save dynamic playlists *without* user input parameters by default. I hope that will make it easier.
'Ratings Light FAQ' (https://github.com/AF-1/lms-ratingslight) 'Dynamic Playlists 3 FAQ' (https://github.com/AF-1/lms-dynamicplaylists#faq) '*List of all plugins*' (https://github.com/AF-1/) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ AF1's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=39306 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=115073
_______________________________________________ plugins mailing list plugins@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins
