On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 20:51:06 +0200, Boris Zbarsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At the moment, Gecko allows adding a single "onreadystatechange"
listener that's notified of changes in readyState. We would like to add
the ability to add such listeners via addEventListener; the event name
would be "readystatechange".
The timeline for this would be to make the change in development builds
in the next several weeks and to ship it hopefully early next year.
Does this seem acceptable? If not, are there counter-proposals?
This has been integrated in the draft:
The readystatechange event MUST be dispatched when
readyState changes value. It MUST NOT bubble, MUST
NOT be cancelable and MUST implement the Event
interface.
I should probably add something about namespaces with all the events in
namespaces fu going around. The event SHALL be not in a namespace, fwiw.
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>