On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 20:51:06 +0200, Boris Zbarsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At the moment, Gecko allows adding a single "onreadystatechange" listener that's notified of changes in readyState. We would like to add the ability to add such listeners via addEventListener; the event name would be "readystatechange".

The timeline for this would be to make the change in development builds in the next several weeks and to ship it hopefully early next year.

Does this seem acceptable?  If not, are there counter-proposals?

This has been integrated in the draft:

   The readystatechange event MUST be dispatched when
   readyState changes value. It MUST NOT bubble, MUST
   NOT be cancelable and MUST implement the Event
   interface.

I should probably add something about namespaces with all the events in namespaces fu going around. The event SHALL be not in a namespace, fwiw.


--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>


Reply via email to