A few of us have been kicking around ideas for improving Routes. I've got an API proposal at http://wiki.pylonshq.com/display/routes/Proposed+Changes
I'd like some feedback from those who use Routes heavily on whether you use the less-common features like 'filter', 'function', '_static', 'url_for(controller="foo")'... whether the proposed changes would totally screw up your application. They would require you to change some of your routes and url_for's, but hopefully wth the effect of making Routes simpler and more deterministic. -- Mike Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
