> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Ben Bangert > Gesendet: Samstag, 24. November 2007 00:35 > An: pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com > Betreff: Re: Routes user survey > > On Nov 23, 2007, at 1:37 AM, Mike Orr wrote: > > I've already started work on Routes again. Additions to > Routes should be slip-streamed into 1.x releases, or if > enough of them stack up in one release, that could be a 2.0 candidate.
I could contribute changes required to enhance the subdomain support for recognizing other variables than HTTP_HOST. I think this feature is critical if you have a mixed environment where you try to induce Pylons apps through subdomain-links, as it is common in corporate Intranets. Currently my implementation look like: Instead of -> mapper.sub_domain = True I do -> mapper.sub_domain = (True, 'HTTP_X_FORWARDED_HOST") or -> mapper.sub_domain = (False, None) to enable subdomain support and to indicate the related HOST-var. I could also do apply a different implementation if requested - I have all related LOCs identified where the related var needs to be used. Kind Regards, Andrew Smart --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
