On 7/19/09 10:08 PM, Damjan wrote: >>> I guess that's not the most secure thing to do but if you want you could >>> try to write your own OpenID implementation. It might be possible that I >>> have oversimplified everything and there are more steps to make OpenID >>> secure. I really doubt that OpenID authors were that stupid so they have >>> not thought about secure cookies ;-) >> It's a prefectly valid thing to do, and I do not see why you should not >> do that. The standard python openid implementation encourages this type >> of approach by making the store pluggable. > > what's the "The standard python openid implementation" ?
http://openidenabled.com/python-openid/ Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman <wich...@wiggy.net> It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
