On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 10:12:13AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 7/10/23 21:40, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin<m...@redhat.com> > > > > Seems safest to revert, but I'll let storage guys decide whether to > > queue this. > > There are multiple possibilities: > > 1) it's a QEMU bug that can be fixed, so no need to revert. > > 2) there's both a QEMU and a Linux bug, but fixing the QEMU side is enough > to hide the Linux bug. The Linux bug can be fixed leisurely. > > 3) it's a Linux bug that is hard to fix, so we need to revert > > 4) it's a Linux bug that is worth fixing, but depending on how easy it is to > trigger the issue we may or may not need to revert > > But yeah, reverting is on the table. > > Thanks, > > Paolo
time to decide? -- MST
