Hi Michael,
On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 10:02 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 09:15:23AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > This reverts commit 8cc5583abe6419e7faaebc9fbd109f34f4c850f2.
> >
> > That commit causes several problems in Linux as described in the BZ.
> > In particular, after a while, other devices on the bus are no longer
> > usable even if those devices are not affected by the hotunplug.
> > This may be a problem in Linux, but we have not been able to identify
> > it so far. So better to revert this patch until we find a solution.
> >
> > Also, Oracle, which initially proposed this patch for a problem with
> > Solaris, seems to have already reversed it downstream:
> > https://linux.oracle.com/errata/ELSA-2023-12065.html
> >
> > Suggested-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
> > Buglink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176702
> > Cc: qemu-sta...@nongnu.org
> > Cc: Mark Kanda <mark.ka...@oracle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarz...@redhat.com>
>
> scsi maintainers, what should be done about this patch?
> we don't want a regression in the release ...
> revert for now and think what's the right thing to do is
> after the release?
We found the issue and fixed it in this release with commit 9472083e64
("scsi: fetch unit attention when creating the request").
So we don't need to revert it anymore.
Thanks,
Stefano
