At 11:47 11/12/2004 -0500, you wrote:
I do think that market is pretty well satisfied by QPC.
Marcel
Well he would say that, wouldn't he. And why not ? It is a brilliant piece of work. and come so far since I last looked at it
To this effect Marcel is absolutely right... and if one wants 100% compatibility with old QL software there's always uQLx, Q-emuLator and Qlay
Hardware based solutions hosted on a PC only make sense if that is a strictly development platform for a stand-alone device later....
Plus what's the point? QPC would be about 1000 times cheaper :-) (Plus it supports everything a Super QXL would support.. (and then some)
The *only* potential other use for such a card would be a PC free of the emulation overhead, however this would be so specialised that it isn't even worth mentioning IMHO
Ah, reached the subject atlast. Are you saying Nirvana is reached already - I thought there were development discussions going on here.
Longuistics,
Sure some Greek, largely purloined by academicians but the Empire imported more than raw materials, words too from all around the world.
_______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
