It bugs me also.
See rest of world : "Computer Active" computer magazine 12th to 25th
May
feature on how to find and play vintage PC games.
They mention ww.abandonia.com a site for freeware, shareware and so
called
abandonware == programs no longer sold or supported by its developer.
They note that abandonware is technically illegal but that the
"copyright holders
are not harmed financially by this distribution of discontinued
software."
It happens in PC land where the market & money amd lawyers are so much
bigger
and agressive.  Why then are the theoretical rights of absentee
copright holders in
the QL world where the market is zip according to all our traders such
a mega issue?
No one can be harmed when sources/modifications are released where
there is no market.
How about this  - even in a PC 100% of zero is always zero.

When will the upgrade of Perfection be release in DWJ web site.

Duncan Neithercut

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of gwicks
Sent: 17 May 2005 22:17
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RE: [ql-users] Digital Precision Software



----- Original Message -----
From: "Darren Branagh"
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 3:43 PM
Subject: RE: RE: [ql-users] Digital Precision Software


>
> This is one of the many things that bugs the hell out of me.
>
> I wish there was a "statute of limitations" or similar on software,
> whereby
> after x years the stuff became free. I'm sure freddy would agree to
> releasing it as freeware, or certainly for a giveaway price. I mean,
what
> real use is a piece of 10 year old QL Software other than
retro/curiosity
> value? You're hardly gonna run the world with it...
>
> There is so much good usable software out there and nobody knows its
user
> status - is it freeware, charityware, commercial, or what? And if we
had
> some certainty on a lot of this, a lot of users may be attracted
back or
> stay with the QL to use them, purely as tinkerers.
>
> I can pick up a copy of PC World, Computer Shopper, PC Pro or any
other PC
> Magazine and find a pile of software (often once costing hundreds of
> pounds)
> stuck to the front cover for the 4.99 cover price, and much of this
is
> less
> than 2-3 years of age. You usually find v.3 or whatever on the cover
disc
> with an offer to get the new v.4 inside at a reduced cost - yet here
we
> are
> debating the status of software that hasn't been sold at all, never
mind
> updated, for over a decade.
>
> Why are people so reluctant to give this stuff away? There is no
money in
> it
> anymore. Just ask any trader :-)
>
> <END RANT>/
>

Don't forget Freddy V. may have sold the software, but that does not
mean he
is the copyright holder. I have said this many times before on this
list.
There are doubts about the copyright position of several of the
ancilliary
programs that formed part of the total Perfection package. When I
enquired
many years ago, no one was sure of the exact copyright status of
Spellchecker, for example. If my memory serves me correctly when Turbo
became PD permission had to be sought not just from Freddy V., but
also the
various authors,

Best Wishes,
Geoff


_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
      • ... John Hall
        • ... Robert Newson
          • ... Jeremy Taffel
            • ... John Hall
          • ... Malcolm Cadman
            • ... Φοίβος Ρ. Ντόκος (Phoebus R. Dokos)
              • ... Malcolm Cadman
        • ... Dilwyn Jones
    • ... gwicks
      • ... Phoebus R. Dokos (Φοίβος Ρ. Ντόκος)
      • ... Duncan Neithercut
    • ... Phoebus R. Dokos (Φοίβος Ρ. Ντόκος)
  • ... Darren Branagh
  • ... Stuart Jones
    • ... Rich Mellor
    • ... Malcolm Cadman
  • ... Stuart Jones
  • ... Stuart Jones
  • ... Darren Branagh

Reply via email to