On 2 Feb 2001, at 8:21, Norman Dunbar wrote: > > It could also have been a contradiction in terms, especially if I said > 'working PC' !! Well yes, but nobody would have believed it, anyway Wolfgang
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Phoebus Dokos
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again P Witte
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Marcel Kilgus
- RE: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Norman Dunbar
- RE: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Norman Dunbar
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Wolfgang Lenerz
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Geoff Wicks
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Wolfgang Lenerz
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Wolfgang Lenerz
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Marcel Kilgus
- RE: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Wolfgang Lenerz
- RE: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Wolfgang Lenerz
- RE: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Norman Dunbar
- RE: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Norman Dunbar
- RE: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Norman Dunbar
- RE: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Claude Mourier 00
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Dilwyn Jones
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again P Witte
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Geoff Wicks
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Peter Graf
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Wolfgang Lenerz