At 06:12 ìì 03/12/2001, you wrote:
>At 03:29 ìì 03/12/2001, you wrote:
>>I found the site to run rather slow on my SGI R5K Indy with Netscape 3.01S.
>> The javascript was really slow to run.
>>
>>Personally I will not create a web site with either Java, Javascript,
>>Flash, or
>>other fluff. I prefer plain html. Granted I won't write any e-commerce
>>sites,
>>but too many regular web pages use this fluff stuff to make it look better at
>>the sacrafice of it working well on a number of browsers. I wish I could
>>send
>>a missle the way of each webmaster that says "update to the latest X
>>brower to
>>see our page".
>>
>>Tim Swenson
>
>I have to disagree partially with you Timothy. The fact that something
>works as is doesn't mean it cannot be improved. If the latter was true,
>then we would be still driving around Ford T's and watching black and
>white silent movies instead of HDTV.
>Yes it is a given in the case of QLers that we don't even have a
>functional browser yet (except Lynx under uQLx) but that also means that
>the average QLer with internet access usually has a Windoze machine.
>Nothing I put on the page does not work with any popular browser... as a
>matter of fact, my pages are constantly checked once published with
>Netscape 3.x and above, IExploder 3.0 and above, Opera and even through
>BeOs with NetPositive (and of course with Netscape, IE, Gnome and
>KBrowser through Red Hat Linux and the regular Netscape and IE on a Mac.
>Everything works. :-)
>Compatibility should be considered yes... but I covered this already :-)
>
>
>Phoebus
Oh and something else... I of course am not responsible for the javascript
code that is automatically added on top of my webpage by the space
provider... this will soon end of course once I move it to my own domain.
