Dave P writes: > I'm worried that the "all features should be available to all platforms" > approach gives us a lowest common denominator result. There aren't any > really good examples, because all of this is talk about future hardware > that doesn't exist yet, but it turns it into a question of how fast SMSQ/E > can be run, instead of what new things can we get it to do? > > For example, it would be nice to see SMSQ used in embedded systems, and in > desktop machines, although both require quite different hings from the OS. > If someone where to, say, make a TVToy, they should be able to drop all of > the redundant modules of SMSQ and alter others as appropriate, and submit > to Wolfgang and have an official branch for that specific application. It > would not help the main SMSQ branch much, but it would result in license > fees. Why use a horse to round up sheep that bite you, when a dog will do? > :o)
I think if you carefully read whats already been written on the subject, youll find satisfactory answers there. Time to move on. Per
