On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 at 21:39:28, Phoebus Dokos wrote: (ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> >On Sat, 15 Feb 2003 00:38:21 +0000, Tony Firshman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: >> Someone has defined a standard to avoid splitting: >> >> <URL:longgggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg >> ggggggggggggggggggggggg> > >Some mailers will not understand the above if there isn't a space >between the ':' and the url Well mine doesn't without the http:// appended. One: <URL:http://long.gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg> <URL: http://long.gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg> I was told you should _not_ leave a space! I know Outback includes the final '>' - that was your original problem I recall. > >> >> Phoebus (and others) doubted this, but I was right (for a change) > >Guilty as charged... (8-)# > >> Yep. Outback simply does not recognise this. >> However even if Outback splits line, my software (and loads of others I >> expect) are clever enough to reassemble and correctly underline >> everything. > >True but when the cut is only one character long even Turnpike or The >Bat! may have problems... >With more than one it is increasingly possible... I think that Turnpike >has enough intelligence built in to check the legality of the address >but then again I cannot be sure. It usually does very well. Lets see what it does to the above. I reckon this is ONT (I am trying to encourage that and the converse: OFT rather than the totally ambiguous OT. ) -- QBBS (QL fido BBS 2:252/67) +44(0)1442-828255 tony@<surname>.co.uk http://www.firshman.co.uk Voice: +44(0)1442-828254 Fax: +44(0)1442-828255 TF Services, 29 Longfield Road, TRING, Herts, HP23 4DG
